Worked through on 601.45 acres at Bahau, Negeri Sembilan.
Yearly average, MPOB; 2026 a forecast. Above the dashed line, palm earns more than solar rent. Tap a bar to use that price.
Palm moves with CPO and yield; solar rent is fixed. Shown at 7.0 t/acre and RM 4,000 a tonne, less RM 2,300 upkeep, before replanting.
IOI releases one parcel for data centre use and owns the plant that powers it. Three income streams from the same land: the sale, the rent and the power.
Cash IOI has received, added up year by year. Bars turn solid once it passes the money put in.
| Solar facility | 167 MWp, 128 MWac, on 500.20 acres at 3 acres per MWp |
| Battery, 4 hour duration | 83 MW / 333 MWh, 2 MWh per MWp over 4 hours |
| Power produced | 236 GWh a year at 1,416 kWh/kWp |
| Daytime surplus into the battery | 68 MW over the midday hours, about 341 MWh a day against 333 MWh of battery |
| Cost to build | RM 496 m, of which batteries RM 147 m and connection RM 17.1 m. With fees, construction interest and reserves, RM 546 m |
| Power sales, year one | RM 94.4 m per year, at 40 sen a unit |
| Cover on the bank loan | 1.30×, sculpted over 9 years at 5% |
| Connection | 1.5 km, costed at RM 17.1 m, against the 6 km in the benchmark rate |
This is a desktop study. It is prepared from the land bank plan for the site, published solar resource data and current market cost benchmarks. No site visit, topographical or geotechnical survey, land title search, environmental assessment, grid impact study or detailed engineering design has been carried out.
Capacity, capital cost, generation, tariff, land price and return figures are indicative and expected to change, in some cases materially. Final parameters are subject to a feasibility study and a detailed engineering design for this site.
Solar farm: 3 acres per MWp, specific yield 1,416 kWh/kWp for this site in year one, degradation 0.4% a year, battery of 2 MWh per MWp at 4 hour duration. Cost: EPC USD 0.402 per watt before connection, with the connection priced separately for 1.5 km rather than the 6 km carried in the benchmark rate, battery USD 220,000 per MWp at about USD 110 per kWh installed, land fees USD 30,000 per MWp, owner contingency 1% of EPC, a development premium of RM 200,000 per MWp with SST, converted at 4.00 MYR to the dollar.
Operating: O&M USD 5,750 per MWp a year escalating 2%, asset management RM 14,000 per MWp with SST escalating 3%, insurance USD 1,500 and site costs USD 5,000 per MWp, KWIE levy 1% of revenue, 2% opex contingency, land rent escalating 5% every three years.
Funding: 69% debt at 5.0%, sculpted over 9 years to a 1.30 times cover, with standard arrangement, advisory, legal and commitment fees, 12 months of interest during construction and a six month debt service reserve. Tax at 24% with accelerated six year capital allowances and losses carried forward. Only the contracted term is counted, with no merchant tail and no terminal value, so the plant still has useful life left over at the end of the figures shown.
A direct line to a neighbouring load carries no System Access Charge, unlike a CRESS sale through the grid. It requires an Energy Commission licence or exemption, which is not yet secured. Export capacity at PMU Bahau has not been confirmed by TNB, and tariffs are assumptions rather than quoted prices.
Nothing here is a valuation of the land, an offer capable of acceptance, a commitment to lease or invest, or a financing proposal.